Trade journal · early prototype

From screenshot
to a record.

Trader Tool is a trade journal with data review before saving. We are developing it into a trader's workspace linking their own plan, market context, and reflection on results.

Today: reviewing and confirming a record.
The complete workspace is a vision, not a current capability.

Interactive demo · simulation
Synthetic browser-local data. Prerecorded AI replies.
Existing interface
Existing Russian-language Trader Tool dashboard with a visible simulation label and synthetic records
Actual application screen, in Russian.
Synthetic data, not trading performance.
About this demo

The interactive demo reuses existing React screens. Create and edit synthetic entries stored only in your browser, then reset them. AI text is prerecorded and labelled as simulation. The application UI is currently in Russian, with an English guide. This is not live Claude or a customer service.

Initial segment · hypothesis

The screenshot is saved.
The journal can wait.

For traders who save trade screenshots, use Telegram, and postpone manual journaling.

Value to test: reach a confirmed entry with less manual input, then return to recent entries for review.

This is a hypothesis. Spreadsheets and other journals remain alternatives: convenience, repeated use, and willingness to pay have not been compared.

The product vision

From what I saw
to what I learned.

  1. 01Market contextWhat is known nowfuture connection
  2. 02My planWhy I might actconcept
  3. 03Trade or skipWhat I chose to doskip record: concept
  4. 04JournalA confirmed entryprototype's core
  5. 05ReviewWhat to revisitAI currently mocked
01 · Today

A journal starts
with a reviewed record.

The current prototype connects a trade draft, user review, explicit confirmation, and a view of the saved result.

Prepare the draft.
Let the user confirm.

Screenshot fields first become a draft. An unknown direction does not default to long. The user corrects the data before a record is saved.

In this demonstration, extraction and the assistant's response are mocked. The demo shows how the application handles those responses and user corrections.

Try the journal yourself →

Or view the prerecorded screenshot flow →

  1. 01 Synthetic screenshot
  2. 02 Draft with missing direction
  3. 03 Correction and confirmation
  4. 04 Saved entry and journal view
  5. 05 Mocked assistant response
02 · Next stage

Validate the help.
Do not assume it.

The Claude integration path is prepared. Real extraction, useful questions, and the user workflow still need evaluation.

01

Evaluate two Claude workflows.

Field extraction and questions about confirmed entries: errors, corrections, unwanted advice, and cost per workflow.

02

Compare the usual method.

In a future pilot, compare logging time and corrections with the participant's spreadsheet or current journal.

03

Does the trader come back?

Observe another self-directed review. One saved trade does not establish usefulness or demand.

Business model · hypothesis

A self-directed trader pays a subscription for journaling and regular review of recent entries.

Pricing, plan scope, and willingness to pay are unvalidated. The demo does not establish billing or demand.
03 · Vision

Context beside
my decision.

Not a magical all-in-one system. A traceable link between research, my own plan, and the result.

Future screen concept · not implemented
Analysis / separate research

Context snapshot

Source and versionAs-of time
  • What data was used
  • What was known when I planned
  • What remains uncertain
Trader Tool / my workflow

My plan

What am I observing?
When would I act or skip?
What would change my plan?

Plan→Action→Result

The proposed first connection attaches a timestamped Analysis snapshot to a user plan and journal entry. Later, expectations, actions, and results could be compared. No integration is implemented today.

Later / research

Forecasting is a hypothesis, not a promise.

The separate Analysis project's long-term goal is to test forecasting hypotheses on independent data. Accuracy, usefulness, and profitability are unproven. An honest research result can be negative.

The core boundary

Context helps me think.
The decision remains mine.

Designed for reflection, not trading signals or automated execution. DYOR.

Review materials

Public prototype materials. Internal notes, application drafts, Russian pages and private data are not included.